Tintern Abbey. The poem is not about this place. It's just that its location is near the banks of the Wye that gives the poem its name. |
We are sometimes asked to describe in what sense William Wordsworth’s Tintern Abbey offer readers a
"religion of nature.” It is, one imagines,
a typical question often asked about pieces written during the Romantic era. In the writings of that era, religious
allusions were frequent. Profane
literature was salted with the phraseology of the Bible. Therefore, conclusions about the spirituality
and religious character of writers, or at least the Christian content of their
writings were—and still are—drawn. For
example, readers coming across The Lamb,
by William Blake, frequently conclude that the work has some sort of religious
meaning. It doesn’t, but conclusions that
it does are still drawn.
True, Blake’s allusion is to the Lamb of God revealed in
scripture, but there is no more religious intent in his use of the phrase than in
the use of phrases like “King of kings,” “virgin born,” “little Lord Jesus,”
and “Mary and Joseph,” at Christmastime in America, circa 2011, by persons
positively identifiable as … let’s just leave it as non-religious.
Tintern Abby, which incorporates no Biblical phraseology at all, offers readers in no sense whatsoever a so called religion of nature. The only hint of a suggestion of religion, and a very weak one at that, is found at line 152, where the author describes himself as a “worshipper of Nature.” (Wordsworth, 261) Wordsworth use of this phrase occurs very near the end of the poem. At that point, the reader is well aware that the writer is an admirer, or a lover of the outdoors and especially of this particular place along the banks of the Wye River in England. For the author to call himself a worshipper of nature is simply to use the strongest word possible to express his attachment to this part of the countryside which called forth so many pleasant memories of his youth. It is a stretch indeed to infer some religious connotation to the remark, especially that some kind of alternative religion, a religion of nature, is suggested.
We are also from time to time asked to describe some of the specific ways
in which nature works as a substitute for traditional religion. But my answer to this is that nature
cannot substitute for traditional religion.
True religion involves the love and adoration of the creator. The word commonly used to express this
reverence is worship. So that when we
say of a man that he worships God, we mean that the man loves, and adores, and
reverences God from his heart. If we say
of a man that he worships nature, we cannot mean the same thing, for nature is
the creation of God, not God himself.
Nor can we rightly mean that such a worshipper of nature has found an
alternative to religion. If words mean
anything, then the worship of nature—in the place of God—is sacrilege. It manifests, not an enlightened
understanding, but a mind void of understanding. Indeed, the idea of nature being a kind of
substitute for real religion has always been one of the hallmarks of the
natural man’s state of condemnation, for “professing themselves wise,” the
apostle wrote, “they became fools,
“And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator …” (King James Bible, Rom. 1.22-25)
I think it is fair to say that if William Wordsworth
intended that any of his writings, particularly those steeped in allusions to
nature or the natural world around us, express some sort of alternative to
traditional religion—i.e., the Catholic Church’s teachings—that would have been
a fact transmitted to us by those who studied his life and writings. In the present anthology serving as the text
for Literature 211, in the biographical sketch of Wordsworth supplied by the
editors, there is no such fact mentioned.
Works Cited.
The Holy Bible: King James Version. London: Cambridge University Press. Undated.
Wordsworth,
William. “Lines Composed a Few Miles
above Tintern Abbey.” Eds. Stephen
Greenblatt and M. H. Abrams. The Norton Anthology to English Literature. 8th Ed., Vol. 2. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are appreciated.