The president says that "now is the time for us to transition," i.e., to end the war in Afghanistan. The Army Times puts the headline thus: "Obama: Time has come to wind down Afghan war."
The Army Times is typical of the sycophantic, leftist press. Not a word in the article about the conditions on the ground in the theater of operations, or of the effect a swift pull-out may have upon national security. Not a syllable in the article that the president's taking the line that "it's time to end the war" might be a way to enhance his chances at reelection. Lots of filler about Syria and high gas prices. And FIVE PARAGRAPHS on the Sandra Fluke story and the president's situation in terms of women voters.
There you have it. Two national disgraces in a single story: The Army Times and the president of the United States.
Comments and Pontifications on Stuff that Interests Me (and that I have Time to Write about)
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
On This Present Campaign
![]() |
| Mrs. Bush was first lady from 1989-1993 |
H'mmmm ...
![]() |
| We are blessed in 2012 to only have to put up with one of them. |
I've always admired Mrs. Bush. And I'm tempted to agree with her on this.
But in this instance, I would like to suggest to my readers that her observation on the campaign doesn't quite go far enough. I mean, look, we should be thankful that we aren't also being subjected to a Democrat Party fight, too!
But in this instance, I would like to suggest to my readers that her observation on the campaign doesn't quite go far enough. I mean, look, we should be thankful that we aren't also being subjected to a Democrat Party fight, too!
Monday, March 5, 2012
The War Poets (WW1)
The war poets are those whose works
were strongly influenced by World War I, known in Britain as the Great
War. In turn, their writings influenced
how Britons thought and felt about war and even how the country planned for
future war.
The war poets include Siegfried Sassoon, Wilfred Owen, Rupert Brooke, Ivor
Gurney, Edward Thomas, Isaac Rosenberg, May Wedderburn Cannan, Robert Graves, David
Jones, and others. Thomas Hardy and A. E.
Housman were contemporaries. However,
they are not classified among the war poets, though each devoted one or more
poems to war. Hardy, for example, wrote Channel
Firing and In Time of ‘The Breaking
of Nations.’(Greenblatt, 1877 and 1884) One of Housman’s contributions was Epitaph on an Army of Mercenaries.
(Greenblatt, 1953) The writings, even
the lives, of the war poets were dominated by the unspeakable horrors of war.
Peter Hart, a British military historian, who compiled a
history of the signature battle of that war, the battle of the Somme, wrote
somewhat dismissively of the war poets when he penned—
The sheer horror of the Somme [a battle that lasted from July 1 to mid-November, 1916] has for a long time been part of British twentieth century mythology. The overall context of the Great War has long been forgotten and the teaching of the subject reduced to an adjunct of English literature that can be brutally summarized in just five words: ‘the pity of it all.’ Politicians are portrayed as Machiavellian, but simultaneously weak, generals are stupid, soldiers are brave helpless victims and war poets—war poets are the later-day saints made flesh. (Hart, 528)
If Hart’s observation is accurate,
one would expect to find correlation to it in the war poets’ poems
themselves. And, indeed, one does. Wilfred Owen, for example, takes aim at
those, principally politicians, who mouthed platitudes about
it being such a “wonderful and great honor to fight and die for your country”
in his memorable poem Dulce et Decorum
Est. (Owen)
Sunday, March 4, 2012
The Tar Heels are the ACC Regular Season Champions
ACC Men's Basketball Standings
Go here for a recap of Carolina's game last night against Duke, which the Tar Heels won convincingly, 88-70.
| (As Of March 3) | ||||
| School | Conf. | Pct. | Overall | Pct. |
| North Carolina | 14-2 | .875 | 27-4 | .871 |
| Duke | 13-3 | .812 | 26-5 | .839 |
| Florida State | 11-4 | .733 | 20-9 | .690 |
| Miami | 9-7 | .562 | 18-11 | .621 |
| Virginia | 8-7 | .533 | 21-8 | .724 |
| NC State | 8-7 | .533 | 19-11 | .633 |
| Clemson | 8-7 | .533 | 16-13 | .552 |
| Maryland | 6-9 | .400 | 16-13 | .552 |
| Virginia Tech | 4-11 | .267 | 15-15 | .500 |
| Wake Forest | 4-12 | .250 | 13-17 | .433 |
| Georgia Tech | 4-12 | .250 | 11-19 | .367 |
| Boston College | 4-12 | .250 | 9-21 | .300 |
Go here for a recap of Carolina's game last night against Duke, which the Tar Heels won convincingly, 88-70.
Saturday, March 3, 2012
The United States Military Academy: Its Role in the Nation’s Early Years
From the nation’s founding until the
Civil War, nearly a century later, no other American institution played a more
significant role in shaping the future of the United States Army. The United States Military Academy served as the
vanguard of the slow and tedious transition of military officership from a
craft practiced by a privileged few to a profession shared by a representative
cross-sample of Americans. From its
beginning, the Academy had always been a landmark and a guiding light to nation’s
armed forces.
![]() |
| West Point campus in modern times |
The 1802 Military Peace Establishment
Act established the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York.[1] Some of its history, however, preceding its
founding. Located on the west bank of
the Hudson River 50 miles north of New York City, the academy’s original
purpose was to serve as a Revolutionary War fortress,[2]
part of General Washington’s Hudson Highlands defense system.[3] According to military historian, Rick
Atkinson, “during the Revolution, George Washington pronounced the military
garrison at West Point ‘the most important post in America.’”[4] In his book, The Long Gray Line, Atkinson also described how Washington
entrusted the defense of West Point to one Benedict Arnold whose name later
became synonymous with treason. Arnold
sold the plans for West Point’s defenses to a British spy, but the whole plot
was foiled before any threat to the garrison actually materialized.
![]() |
| Sylvanus Thayer |
After the War of 1812, the nation became
a little more comfortable with the idea of maintaining a standing army. Senior leadership—civilian and military—saw
the need to establish a school of professional military officers. Sylvanus Thayer (Class of 1808[5])
became superintendent in 1817 and, with the backing of President Calhoun,
overhauled the school’s academic and disciplinary systems. His reforms included organizing the corps of
cadets into a battalion, establishing an academic board to oversee curricular
matters, dividing classes into sections according to merit, and holding
semiannual examinations.[6] Thayer’s superintendency lasted until 1833.[7]
![]() |
| Dennis Hart Mahan |
Dennis Hart Mahan (Class of 1834[8])
was among a group of professors recruited by Thayer. Mahan served as Professor of Civil and
Military Engineering and the Art of War from his graduation to his death in
1871, with a six-year interlude during which he studied military engineering
and fortifications in France.[9] Thayer and Mahan followed the French example as
they transformed the curriculum at West Point.
Like the French schools they had studied, Thayer and Mahan stressed
military engineering, fortifications, and tactics.[10] Mahan wrote his own textbooks and pioneered
the American study of war that based on Napoleon.[11]
Friday, March 2, 2012
The U.S. Army between 1900 and the outbreak of World War I
![]() |
| World War I recruiting poster |
The Army advanced in terms of professionalism and preparedness in spite of the nation’s long tradition of hostility to these things. Despite its success in the Spanish-American war, it also made great strides in terms of capabilities.
Guiding all its other changes, the Army reorganized as an institution. A war college was established in 1900 which Secretary of War Elihu Root used to form the nucleus of a general staff—the brain of the Army. This led to the passage of the General Staff Act in 1903 and the creation of the position of chief of staff. Under the law, 45 staff officers supported the chief of staff. Some served in Washington “while others served in the headquarters of the Army’s geographic departments, which supervised field forces.” In this one may see, in embryonic form, the rise of today’s geographic combatant commands.
Thursday, March 1, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.jpg)





